主君的太阳

福州市政协为闽江流域高质量发展聚智汇力_我的网站

A |     AI摘要      福州市政协召开专题协商会，聚焦闽江生态保护与文旅融合。    

    Francesco Faiola
Editor's Note:
Ahead of the opening of the 2026 World AI Conference and High-Level Meeting on Global AI Governance, Chinese AI start-up Moonshot AI released its Kimi K3 large language model. As the world's largest open-source model by parameter count to date, this launch marks a significant step forward in the development of China's artificial intelligence models.
From the C919 airliner soaring into the skies to Unitree's humanoid robots stealing the show; from DeepSeek pushing the AI frontier to Moonshot AI's landmark unveiling of Kimi K3 - China's wave of homegrown innovations has dominated global headlines in recent years, delivering a steady stream of breakthroughs.
At a meeting in Beijing that brought together the national science and technology award conference, the general assemblies of the members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE), and the 11th national congress of the China Association for Science and Technology in July, Chinese President Xi Jinping, also general secretary of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee and chairman of the Central Military Commission, stressed that the 15th Five-Year Plan period (2026-2030) is a critical phase for tackling tough challenges in building up the country's strength in science and technology.
"We must seize the historic opportunity, rise to the challenges of the times, accelerate efforts to achieve high-level self-reliance and strength in science and technology, and make steady progress toward the 2035 goal of becoming a leading country in science and technology," he said.
In the article "Strive for Greater Strength and Self-Reliance in Science and Technology" included in the fourth volume of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China, Xi pointed out, "Through years of endeavor, our country's overall strength in science and technology has improved substantially. We therefore have a solid foundation, and are fully confident in our ability to seize the opportunities offered by the new revolution in science, technology and industry to achieve greater results." The article also mentioned that "We should participate to the full in global science and technology governance, contribute Chinese wisdom, and shape a philosophy of technology for good purposes, so that science and technology better serve human wellbeing, and enable China's science and technology industry to contribute more to building a global community of shared future."
In the 27th installment of the special series "Decoding the Book Xi Jinping: The Governance of China," the Global Times, along with the People's Daily Overseas Edition, continues to invite Chinese and foreign scholars, translators of Xi's works, practitioners with firsthand experience, and international readers to focus on the theme of striving for greater strength and self-reliance in science and technology. Together, they share views on China's tech growth, governance principles, and global cooperation in science and technology.
In the 27th article of the "Readers' Reflections" column, Global Times (GT) talked to Francesco Faiola (Faiola), an Italian professor at the Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences with Chinese Academy of Sciences and recipient of the Chinese Government Friendship Award.
GT: Chinese President Xi Jinping delivered a keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the 2026 World AI Conference and High-Level Meeting on Global AI Governance on July 17. He said that as a responsible major country, China is always committed to providing international public goods relating to AI. In the article "Boost Basic Research and Achieve Greater Strength and Self-Reliance in Science and Technology" included in the fifth volume of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China, Xi said, "It is important that we adopt a more open-minded approach to international exchange and cooperation in research to create an open, globally competitive innovation ecosystem." Amid the current complex global landscape, China remains firmly committed to keeping its doors open to international scientific collaboration. In your view, where does China's confidence in this commitment come from?
Faiola: I think China's confidence in staying open comes from a deep shift in mindset. The Chinese people, especially the scientific community, now really believe they are not inferior to Westerners. For a long time, even many people here thought top science had to happen at a Western address. When I first came, I believed that too. The US and Europe seemed like the only serious places for breakthroughs. Now that idea is changing, and moving toward China, because the evidence of leadership is everywhere: stem cell standards, artificial intelligence (AI) efficiency, green manufacturing. It's undeniable. China knows it has everything needed to attract and keep international talent. It's no longer a developing country playing catch up. It's a place that's helping set the global agenda.
That self-assurance is the bedrock of openness. When you truly believe you have unique strengths, like a huge organoid screening capability or a community of scientists who think deeply, you don't fear open doors. You want colleagues from everywhere to walk through so the science moves faster. My own lab works with European centers as equals. That parity is real. But we also know not everyone abroad gets this transformation yet. A lot of people still imagine Chinese science as just following others. That's exactly why China is pushing openness harder: funding lines for foreign principal investigators, open innovation hubs in Beijing, active participation in setting international standards. These aren't defensive moves. They're proof of a country confident enough to invite the world in, show what it can do, and create knowledge together.
On a deeper level, the confidence is also just rational. The big challenges - environmental problem, pandemic preparedness and precision medicine - are global. If China closed itself off, the data and validation its own regulators need would get weaker. So, the open door isn't charity. It's the smart recognition that scientific greatness today gets multiplied when you share it.
GT: In the article "Strive for Greater Strength and Self-Reliance in Science and Technology" included in the fourth volume of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China, Xi pointed out, "Through years of endeavor, our country's overall strength in science and technology has improved substantially. We therefore have a solid foundation, and are fully confident in our ability to seize the opportunities offered by the new revolution in science, technology and industry to achieve greater results." From the domestically built large passenger jet to DeepSeek, Unitree Robotics, and Moonshot AI's Kimi K3, China's innovation achievements have been making headlines. How do you assess China's achievements in sci-tech innovation in recent years? 

Faiola: I measure China's innovation success in a very personal way. My parents are old, living in a small Italian town. They don't speak English. They don't understand molecular biology. They can't read a scientific paper. But over the past few years, they've called me up more than once, excited, telling me about a Chinese airplane or a humanoid robot or some AI breakthrough they saw on Italy's main TV news or in the newspapers.
That tells me something deep. These aren't niche stories for tech insiders. They are real global news, landing in the living rooms of retirees who barely use a smartphone. I'm not bragging to them about China's progress. They are telling me. When achievements get that far into everyday European life, it's a sign China is doing something the world finds worth talking about.
The C919 plane, DeepSeek, Unitree Robotics - these aren't one-off hits. They prove China can now conceive, design, and build complex, original systems on its own, whether it's an airliner, an advanced AI model, or an agile robot. That takes deep integration across different fields, aerodynamics, materials, real time control, and AI.
DeepSeek's whole philosophy, doing more with less, is exactly how we created affordable organoid screening tools. And the quiet shift from rule taker to rule maker in chemical safety standards, that mirrors the C919's ambition to compete globally on certification. All this shows China is blending manufacturing, digital smarts, and biology into one force. But my real proof is what I hear from my students. They don't just apply discoveries from papers anymore. They question the assumptions behind them. That intellectual confidence, and the fact it echoes all the way back to a small Italian town, is why I'm sure China will fully seize this moment.
GT: President Xi said that AI development should not be a solo performance by a single country, but a symphony of international cooperation. Having conducted research in China for many years, you are not only a witness but also a driving force behind China-Europe scientific exchanges. Looking ahead, how can both sides deepen complementary advantages and achieve mutually beneficial empowerment to jointly address global challenges such as climate change and health? Over the next five years, which specific sectors should China-Europe science and technology collaboration prioritize?
Faiola: I grew up in Italy and now I lead a lab in Beijing while working with colleagues all over Europe. So, China-Europe teamwork isn't some abstract idea to me. It's how my week actually looks. The old cliché, European basic research plus Chinese scale and speed, is already outdated. Both sides now generate novel insights. The relationship has to become genuine two-way cocreation.
I see three practical things that would deepen it. First, we need truly joint funding: one grant, one integrated team, maybe a Max Planck group and a Chinese Academy of Sciences group, with a single scientific plan and students who genuinely rotate between the labs. Second, we need to harmonize regulations and ethics for organoid technologies. Europe has advanced thinking on governance. China has manufacturing scale and the drive to get things into clinics. If we co-develop shared quality and ethical standards for organoid testing, we basically set the global benchmark. A liver organoid made in Europe could then be used directly for a toxicity screen in China without repeating all the validation. Third, we need deliberate talent circulation, not a zero-sum competition. Joint PhD programs where a student naturally moves between continents.
The science doesn't care about borders. If we build the shared tools now, China and Europe can show the world a model where shared knowledge beats division.
GT: Recently, some Western media and think tanks are peddling "China Shock 2.0," claiming that China is achieving fast development in high-tech sectors such as renewable energy and AI and relies on foreign markets to absorb its overcapacity, thus reducing the market share of developed countries and sending more serious shock waves to the global economy compared with the era of traditional manufacture industry. What's your comment on this? In your view, does this represent a new pretext for Western protectionism, or is it an unavoidable external misunderstanding amid China's industrial upgrading?

Faiola: I'm a bench scientist, not a political analyst. I stick to what I can see and measure in my own work. So, I'm not going to guess what the media or think tanks intend. I'll just tell you what the facts show me, and from my lab, the "China Shock 2.0" story just doesn't match up.
In my field of stem cell toxicology, the world is desperate for human relevant safety tests to replace animal testing. Tens of thousands of chemicals still don't have proper hazard data. When Chinese labs turn out high throughput organoid platforms at a fraction of the old cost, that's not dumping "overcapacity" into a full market. It's filling a huge shortage. A researcher in Brazil or Kenya suddenly gets access to a toxicity screen that never existed for them before. Demand is skyrocketing, not standing still. Meeting that demand is a service, not a shock.
With AI, it's the same pattern. DeepSeek's efficiency makes it cheaper and easier for biomedical researchers around the world to use these tools. It's helping create new markets, not stealing a fixed pie. Sure, any big shift causes some dislocation. The answer to that is domestic support and transition policies, not blocking technologies that help solve planetary problems.
。经深入调研，委员们提出18项举措，与部门共商打破壁垒、统筹资源，助力打造闽江流域高质量发展“福州样板”。         近几个月，政协委员和专家怀揣一个个子课题，奔赴闽江流域各点位察实情、听民声。这一回，他们的目标清晰而明确：将“出炉”的务实建议条分缕析，与相关部门面对面，畅谈建议落地的可能性。    “有没有可能将全域文旅‘打包’，建立长效机制？”“我们已上线10条跨区域旅游线路，后续会构建起互补联动格局。”8月12日，聚焦“母亲河”流域高质量发展的专题协商会——“筑牢闽江生态屏障，激活文旅产业动能”在市政府会议室举行，部分政协委员、民主党派代表与市直部门负责人一题一议、充分协商。    带着思路     精准选题谋全局     守护闽江生态底色、激活文旅发展动能，是福州深化国家生态文明试验区建设、推进文化和旅游深度融合、赋能现代化国际城市建设的关键抓手。    要答好这道命题，关键在于统筹兼顾生态保护与开发利用，为此，市政协人资环委、民革市委会、民盟市委会组成联合课题组。前期，市政协就十分明确，遵循“生态优先、绿色发展、以文塑旅、以旅彰文”的思路，不脱离现实谈保护、不牺牲生态谋发展，从闽江流域生态保护与文旅开发融合发展的痛点难点入手破题。    广泛听取市直部门、智库专家意见后，课题组对标先进地区发展经验，赴无锡、苏州、湖州、南平等地考察学习，借鉴各地流域治理、文旅融合、业态创新、区域协同的成熟模式。

B | 但经验不能简单照搬照抄，必须立足本地实际消化吸收。    课题组结合福州闽江流域资源禀赋、发展现状，确立“守好生态屏障、盘活资源优势、激活产业动能、补齐发展短板”的调研主线，为后续调研报告起草、精准建言献策把好方向。    “闽江流域分布着丰富的文化、生态资源，是很好的政校合作课题实践。”福建师范大学人口与发展研究中心主任林李月教授带领研究生团队，深度参与调研踏勘、数据分析、课题研讨，依托专业学科优势，为课题研判、问题剖析、对策打磨提供科学支撑。    摸清现状     深耕调研察实情     课题组紧扣闽江福州段全域脉络，深入沿江县（市）区，全覆盖走访滨江岸线、湿地保护区、文旅景区、乡村节点，面对面走访企业、基层干部与群众，全方位摸排生态治理情况、文旅业态布局、产业发展堵点。

C |     历经多轮实地调研、智库研讨、座谈问计、多方征求意见以及文稿打磨审定，课题组最终形成内容翔实、数据充分、兼具理论高度与实践价值的调研报告。

D |     从发展成效看，福州闽江生态保护治理成果丰硕。

E | 2025年闽江首次实现全流域水质全优，福州获评“国际湿地城市”，闽江干流、大樟溪等获评省级美丽河湖优秀案例。通过严格落实生态管控、深化“三源齐控”污染治理、搭建全域智慧监测体系、健全跨区域协同治理机制，闽江流域水环境质量持续提升，生态基底愈发坚实。

F |     同时，闽江流域文旅产业能级稳步攀升，闽江夜游、内河游船、生态康养、乡村文旅等业态持续升温，2025年闽江游、内河游的游客量稳步增长，2026年春节假期客流、营收再创新高。沿江县（市）区因地制宜打造差异化文旅品牌，闽都文化、船政文化、红色文化、海丝文化深度赋能产业发展，闽江流域生态文旅协同发展格局初步成形。    总结成效的同时，课题组也精准梳理剖析当前存在的发展短板，并将其纳入最终报告：一体化规划不够精细、汛期水质存在波动、文旅产业高附加值业态稀缺，文旅复合型策划、运营、营销人才缺口较大，诸多问题制约流域文旅产业高质量提档升级。

G |     共话落地     聚智献策谋实干     协商会上，与会委员、专家立足调研成果，紧扣发展堵点、民生关切、产业痛点，提出一系列前瞻性、针对性、可操作性强的对策建议，围绕全域规划、生态治理、业态创新、红色赋能、要素保障五大维度，细化形成18项具体举措，全力推动闽江生态保护与文旅产业深度融合。

H |     针对“全域文旅资源如何统筹”“跨区域联动机制如何建立”“生态优势如何转化为产业优势”等核心问题，委员们与市发改委、市生态环境局、市文旅局、市林业局等市直部门现场互动、深入磋商。各职能部门逐一回应委员关切，坦诚交流工作思路，明确后续推进举措，现场协商氛围浓厚、共识凝聚充分。    “闽江流域是跨区域流域，出台全域生态保护和文旅产业高质量发展规划很有必要。”委员潘辉现场建言，要打破行政壁垒和管理路径依赖。    “调研报告提到‘下船即走’现象突出。”委员林春强提出，应建立闽江沿线文旅码头统一运营管理与利益共享机制，推动各码头、各航线实现“一票通游”。    一个个建议现场提、当场议，明确推进——有的已着手优化完善相关举措；有的沿江县（市）区践行“一域一特色、一段一亮点”进行保护开发；有的创新水上文旅、生态康养、红色研学、影视文旅等新业态，串联整合闽江红色地下航线、船政文化、海丝文化等资源，延伸文旅产业链条。    在一言一句、集思广益的互动中，本次协商建言更贴合实际、落地举措更具实操性，不仅形成精准专业、靶向发力的专题推进方案，也让政协建言履职效能得到彰显，更让闽江流域生态文旅高质量发展的思路愈发清晰、实施路径愈发明确。    “生态保护是功在当代、利在千秋的系统工程，文旅融合是赋能发展、惠及民生的长期工程。”市政协相关负责人表示，要坚持生态优先、绿色发展，科学有序开发利用闽江流域自然人文资源，全力打造闽江流域生态保护和文旅融合发展“福州样板”，为福州加快建设现代化国际城市注入绿色文旅新活力。（记者 颜学辉）。

Current article:http://cuozubeishenjingli.cfd/list_31uv/d9mx.html

Published on:13:56:40